Tuesday, 27 October 2015

Theory of Biographia Literaria, chapter: 14

To evaluate my assignment click here

Name : Gohil Beenaba  s.
Roll No: 15
Email Id: binagohil1995@gmail.com
Course -3: Literary theory and criticism
Subject for assignment: Theory of Biographia Literaria, chapter: 14
Submitted: M.K Bhavnagar University (department of English)



Biographia literaria, or in full “Biographia Literaria; or Biographical sketches of ‘My Literary Life’ and opinion”, is an autobiography in discourse by Samuel Taylor Coleridge ,which he published in 1817,in two volumes.
It has twenty-three (23) chapters.
In Biographia Literaria Coleridge focuses on these main points:
1) Fancy and imagination
1) Greatest poetry is that which achives synthesis among elements,emotions and attitudes.
3) Poem and poetry
4) Coleridge’s new technique of criticism is called “appreciative criticism” 

There is a two points of cardinal of poetry given by S.T.Coleridge are as above:
1.                The power of exiting the sympathy of the reader by a faithful adherence to the truth of nature.
2.                The power of giving the interest of novelty by the modifying colors of imagination.


The series of poems might be composed of two sorts:

1.                The incidents and agents were to be in part at least, supernatural; and the excellence aimed at was to consist  in the interesting of the affections by the dramatic truth of such emotions, supposing them read. And real in this sense they have been to every human being who from whatever source of delusion, has at anytime believed himself under supernatural agency.
2.                The characters and the incidence where to be such as will be founding every village and its vicinity where there is a meditative and feeling mind to seek after them, or to notice them, when they present themselves.
      The poem contains the same element as a prose composition. But the difference is between the combination of those element and objects aimed  at in both the composition. According to the difference of object will be the difference of combination. It the object of poem may simply be to facilitate the memory to recollect certain facts he would make use of certain artificial arrangement of words with the help of meter. As a result composition will be a poem by meter, or by rhyme.
       In this the lowest sense, one might attribute the name of a poem to the well-known enumeration of the days in the several months;

     Thirty days hath September,
     April, June and November , & etc. 

®                       In this idea originated the plan of the ‘Lyrical ballad’ , in which it was decided that Coleridge’s endeavors should be directed to person and character supernatural ,or at least romantic
®                       On the Wordsworth’s side the decision is to himself as his object, to give the charm of novelty to thing of everyday life, and directing it to loveliness and the wonders of words before us.
®                       With this view Coleridge wrote THE ANCIENT OF MARINAR’ and was preparing among other poems ‘THE DARK LADIE’ and THE CHRISTABLE’, in which he should have more nearly realized his ideal, than he had   done in his first attempt.
®                       But according to Coleridge Wordsworth’s production had proved so much more successful and number of poem so much more and greater also.
®                        
vIMAGINATION AND FANCY:

S.T.Coleridge brought back the issue of imagination and fancy in his discussion of poetry in Biographia Literaria.
 Imagination: Divided into two parts 1) primary
2) secondary

1)  parimary : Uniting the objects of sense.
2)  2) uniting the objects of senses with emotions and feelings.

Poetry  id creation of secondary imagination.



        To Wordsworth, imagination was something taken for granted, especially in poets. Coleridge while agreeing with Wordsworth’s premise, nevertheless, clarifies for himself what imagination was; what was the difference between imagination and fancy
         Biobraphia Literaria was one of the Coleridge’s main critical studies. In this work, he discussed the elements of writing and what writing should be considered genius. Central to the Bioraphia Literaria , is his discussion of imagination and fancy. Coleridge ,too, rejected that the mind was ” Tubula Rasa” on which external experience and sense impressions were in printed stored, and recalled. Rather ,he believed that imagination is innate.
        Coleridge divides mind into imagination and fancy.
        Imagination is “active and dynamic”, fancy is “passive and mechanical”
         Frederick Engell one of the two original Marxist’s critics, has observed that the imagination into then ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ draws a distinction between creative acts that are intentional and will full and deliberate. 
  POETRY AND PROSE:
   What is poetry? Is also nearly same question what is poem? The answer to the one is involved in solution of other. For it is a distinction resulting from the poetic genius itself. Thus, the difference between poem and poetry is not given clear term. To deifying poetry, proceeds to enumerate the characteristics of the imagination. In other words we can say that ‘poetry’ is an activity of poet’s mind, and poem is merely one of form of is expression of that activity for imagination.
It manifests itself most clearly in the balance or reconciliation of opposite or discordant qualities such as:-
1)Of sameness with difference
2) Of  general, with image
3)The idea , with image
4)The individual, with the representative
5)The sense of novelty and freshness, with old and familiar object
6)A more than usual state of emotion, with more than usual order
7) Judgment with enthusiasm

          Coleridge’s words:- “To establish the principle of writing rather than to furnish rule about how to pass judgment on what had been written by others”
       According to Coleridge a poem is that species of composition which is opposed to work of science, by proposing for its immediate object pleasure, not truth.
      Coleridge is first English critic who based his literary criticism on philosophical principles. Coleridge busied himself with the basic question of “how it came to be there at all”. He was more interested in the creative process that made it, what it was, then in the finished product
     Each of poetic writing has an immediate aim pleasure and ultimate aim Poetic writing has pleasure as its immediate end. Yet, poetry may have some profound truth as their ultimate purpose.
    But as it is immediate of poetry to produced pleasure and meter conduce it, poetry prefers it to the language of prose.
      From this Coleridge proceeds to make a definition of what he calls ‘a legitimate poem is one where each point contributed and must support each other to explain each other.
        According to Coleridge mere super addition of meter or rhyme does not make a poem.
      Coleridge gives no real justification of the old statement of a poem of any length; neither can be or ought to be all poetry
      Poetry for Coleridge is a wider category than of a poem, i.e. poetry is a kind of activity which can be engaged in painters or philosophers and scientists and is not confined to those who employ material language’ or even to those who employ language of any kind.
      Poetry in this larger sense brings” the whole soul of man” into activity, with each faculty playing its part. According to its relative worth and dignity this take place whenever the “secondary imagination” comes into operation.

CRITICS VIEW ON BIOGRAPHIA LITERARIA:

          The work is long and seemingly loosely structured, and although there are autobiographical   elements, it is not a straightforward or liner autobiography.
Instead, it is meditative.

         Critics have reacted strongly to the Biographia Literaria. Early reactions were that it was a demonstration of Coleridge’s Opiate-driven    decline into ill health. Recent re-evaluation  have given it more credit .while contemporary critics recognize the degree to which Coleridge borrowed from his sourse,they also see in the work far more structure  and planning than is apparent on first glance.
   In the last section of the chapter 14 Coleridge considers to distinguish poem from poetry. Coleridge points out that “Poetry of the highest kind may exist without meter and even without the contradistinguishing objects of a poem”. He gives example of the writing of Plato, Jeremy, Taylor and Bible. The quality of the prose in this writing is equal to that of high poetry. He also asserts that the poem of any length neither can, nor ought to be poetry.       
    



To evaluate my assignment click here


Arjuna comes out as a negative character in T. P.Kailasam’s play “The purpose”.


Name: Gohil Beenaba S
Roll No: 15
Paper No: 4, Indian writing in English-
                   Pre-Independence 
Subject for assignment: Arjuna comes out as a negative character in T. P.Kailasam’s play “The purpose”. 
Submitted: M K Bhavnagar University (department of English)




               In this play Kailasam tried to high-light something which in original myth was neglected. such as Arjuna’s concentration power and guru Drona’s faith on Arjuna about he is the greater archer in the world. When we talk about Arjuna thoughts and images are com and go in our mind and we se the character of Arjuan as very grand, just , great archer and so on. But in this play writer tried to throw the light on the dark side of the character of Arjuna. As a ambitious and self centered person.
                This play is  inspired by the epic Mhabharata in which Arjuna considered as a world famous archer , but in in this play we can see the struggle of Arjuna for his practice to became the greatest archer. Whereas the other character of Eklavya a Nishidhaa boy and his reason of became the greatest archer of the world.
              The very begging of the play the all Kuru Princes are  practice on the ground and Guru Drona teach them. At that time Taayaajee Bhishma came there and Guru Drona and Bhishama both are talking about the training of princes’.
At that time we see the ambitious prince Arjuna. He has aim to become the greatest archer of the world. The same itself the Arjuna’s aim of life. He is noble too. It can be seen when Arjuna prostrates himself before Bhishma. Arjuna called his aim as “personal ambition”. In the very young aim,his aim was personal it written it is written line this:
 Arjuna:’ Yes, Taataajee! Why, I shall HAVE to remember it, is my personal ambition to be the most famous archer of all time.
             In this line we can see  Arjuna not only ambitious but also as negative. Because as a Arya his aim and ambition not must be personal according to that Arjuana seems to be quite negative.
                    


                  In between the dialogue of Arjuan with Eklavya and Guru Drona we find his pride for power and as he is a Arya. As we see on very beginning of play Guru Drona promises Bheeshma that he only trains the kuru Princes’ , so Arjuna several time going to remember them that promise as that he is not good pupil. Such as:-
Arjuna: (to Guru Drona) you will make me the greatest archer in the world, will you not Guruji?

Arjuna: who is he? And what does he  want here 

Arjuna: (turning to Drona and  with a wild gesture of his arms pointing to Eklavya )what is all Gurujee!!?

Arjuna:- Upset beyomd all control , speake in incoherent spasms) All  this…I mean …this mad talk…of this…this…forest…person!(raising his voice to all frenzied shriek) Who is he, Gurujee ?  And what does he want here?
             Arjuna: ( addresses Drona in a voice of fraught with a note of warning) As it is you have not enough time to teach all of us…and if you are taking another pupil….

Arjuna: Gurujee you seem to have forgotten all about the promise toy have made to Taayaajee!!!


Arjuna: (To Drona) Did you not promise to make me the greatest archer in the world Gurujee?
    
               So, as we see several time he going to remember his Guru about his  promise and sometimes his pride reflects in his dialogue.
                     In some of his dialogue we can se that he  himself not confident that he is the greatest archer of the world or he can become the famous  for all time.
     As the play progress he purly comes out as negative character. He can even never imagine that the Nisheedha boy can also able to became the archer, the greatest archer. But here we see the difference of them aims. One wants to be the greatest archer because it is his ambition and the other one wants to be the greatest archer because he wants to save the innocent animal from the wild. But because Eklavya is a Nisheedha boy he is not allow to became the archer. Because the only Arya can became the archer.
              In the play Arjuna insulted Eklvya as calling him a low-born Nisheedha boy, impudent boy,aragged nishaadha urchin, forest boy and as the barbarian.
           
          In the first act of the play we came to know that Arjuna take pride, “silly Pride” on his caste and on his wealth. It reflects in his dialogue:
  Arjuna: (leering at Eklavya) Gurujee!...to take you!, A Nishaadha !!...as a fellow-pupil of us royal prince! You must be mad to think of it! Why silly impudent boy, you do not know how great and noble our Gurujee is ! He has refuse to tuitions to many hundreds prince who would have given him many jewels and wealth!  And now, would hw take his pupil a ragged Nishaadha urchin, too poor to give him any DKSHINA? 
    Here we see the pride of Arjuna about wealth and of being the pupil of Guru Drona, though he himself many time knowingly and unknowingly insulted him.
        



          Arjuna loss his temper in very small meter and he is very hasty by nature. In this play Arjuna is much centered person from the beginning to the end of the play. In the play Arjuna is afraid of any competition of archery.  
                   The second act of the play begins such as:-
                     ACT: 2
            [SIX YEAR LATER]
  Place: A GLADE IN THE FOREST
Discover: Dronacharya and Arjuna on a path which runs Right to Left along the foreground


          So as we see above that  the play begins after six years of last act. Dronacharya and Arjuna both are on the path and going one place to another at that time they accidentally meet Eklavya , un knowingly Eklavya saved Arjuna from wild animal and Arjuna became impress form his archery. But later on he came to know that Eklavyas is the Nishaadha boy whom he met ago. And suddenly he became agree and feel minor about his skill and as the greatest archer of the world. When Eklvya teels him that Drinacharya is his  Guru Arjuna not ready to accept it and than the things are reveal about the statue  of Guru Drona and Arjuna  became agree on Guru Dronacharya and reminds him his promise which he gives to Bheeshma.
    We can see Arjuna wholly in this  dialogue:



Arjuna:    (Still querulous)meant or                                                      
 Unmeant …..I only know that you have Not kept the promise you made! Besides , Gurujee a moment ago you said , as an archer he has far far ahead  of both you and me! If as you both make out all the archery he knows only what he learn from YOU..how can he have learnt from YOU .. the archery that has made him greater archer than YOU…??!
Drona: (with knit brows) That is the puzzle partha,, I am trying to solve convinced as I am that all the archery that this little man known is what I taught him unknowingly. I cannot see HOW I COULD HAVE HELPED HIM BECOME A GREATER ARCHER OF THAN MY OWN SELF!?
  Eklavya : (laughing and joyous ring)just when bewildered me at first ,Gurujee ,and made me ask mother now and again how I could became the greatest archer in the world …when the guru learnt from ,could still wield a bow!? And mother held every time that A PIPIL CAN LEARN MORE FROM HIS GURU THAN WHAT THE GURU HIMSELF KNOWS IF THE PURPOSE OF PUPLE FOR LEARNING IS NOBLER THAN WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THE GURU’S WAS HE LEARNT FROM HIOS GURU!!
Drona: (amazed) Wonderful!
Arjuna: (sardonically) I daresay it is all wonderful to you, Gurujee! But all wonder will not save you from your danger!!
Eklavya: (Incredulously) “Danger” to Gurujee!!(laughs) what danger!
Arjuna: Why the being the jeered at by all the world as one who did not keep his promise! (scoffingly) being a forest-roving nishaadha, it would mean nothing to you of course! But to Gurujee a renowned Aryan bramhana, it is a serious thing to suffer the ill repute of being sneered at as a liar..
        After that Arjuna says he tells the truth to the world  Guru DRonacharya not kept his promise. He than ask to Gurujee to solve this problem. And his fear is reflects in this dialogue:
Arjuna:  HARDLY! Even if you never more handle your bow and shaft for the rest of your life…wherever...and…whenever I handle MY bow and shaft I shall somehow feel that in some forest-corner of the world THERE IS A NISHAADHA WHO IF HE WANTS TO….CAM WILD BOW AND ARROW BETTER THAN I!! and that hardly is REALLY  “being” AND “heeling the greatest archer in the world …and certainly not save Guruee from the ignominy of being know as a L I A…
            This is might the planning of Arjuna to make feel ashamed Eklavya and to make ready to give him GURUDAKSHINA.
           

      As we see in detain that throughout whole play Arjuan comes out as a negative character and an agree man who became temper in such silly thing. As well as Eklavya who’s purpose is much good than Arjuna to became the greatest archer of the world. Then also he have to suffer a lot.  But for what ? for his caste? Or for that he is not a Arya or not belongs from royal Kuru family?





    


Characteristics of Metaphysical Poetry



Name: Gohil Beenaba  S
RollNo: 15
Course-3: the Renaissance Literature
Subject for assignment: characteristics of metaphysical poetry with the help of  John Donne’s poems
Submitted: MK Bhavnagar University (department of English)






                 “Metaphysical poetry” is a term coined by the Dr. Samuel Johnson- A great Neo-classicist who made use this term for the first time in his introduction to the life of ‘Abraham Cowley’. When Dr. Johnson used this, it was in a derogatory sense-negative sense to criticize the poetry of John Donne and his followers. With the passing of time the same term became a term of appraisal for the poetry of John Donne and his followers. Most of the metaphysical poets even don’t know one another or read one another’s work.
List of major metaphysical poets:
1)         John Donne
2)         Richard Crashaw
3)         George Herbert
4)         Abraham Cawly

       There are certain characteristics of the Metaphysical Poetry. The chief of them are under:
1)         Conscious attempt
2)         Display of scholarship
3)         Far-fetched  images
4)         Scholarship and musicality


[1] Conscious attempt:-
            All the metaphysical poets made the conscious attempt to differ from the poetry of pridicisers poets. They tried to differ both in the METTER and MENNER of writing poetry. They were of the opinion that they would fail to catch the attention of the readers if they

continued writing poetry just like the former poets. They wanted to established their unique identity as poets and so they made a conscious attempt to differ from other(former) poets.
  
[2] Display of scholarship:-
          All the metaphysical poets-John Donne, Richard creshow, George Herbert ,Abraham Cawley and  others tried to display their scholarship through their poems. They  were university graduates, men of learning and wit. They made a conscious attempt to reflect their learning and scholarship in their poems. It was to display their knowledge that tey tried to differ in the matter and manner of writing poetry.


[3] Far-fetched images :-
     
                 The third remarkable feature if the metaphysical poetry is their choice of distant images and conceits in the writing of poems. The Meta0hysical poets did not select images from those fields which have nothing to do with the theme of their poems. They selected their images from the field like engineering, history, biology, geometry and many other fields. The far-fetched images of their poems make it difficult for the readers to understand their poems. Andrew Marvell extensive made use og geometrical and agricultural images in his poems. George Herbert used images are from the field of


Engineering for his poem. John Donne made use of poems of biological images for the writing of poem. Far-fetched images proved to be the best way for all metaphysical poets to display their knowledge and wit.

[4] Scholarship and musicality:-

             Dr. Johnson has highlighted one remarkable feature of the metaphysical poetry. He mentioned that the metaphysical poetry stood a trial of their figure but not a trial of their ear. The metaphysical no doubt proved their scholarship in the writing of their poetry but they failed in creating music in their poetry. There is no presence of rhyme in their poems as it is to be found



in the poem of Shakespeare and Sidney or in the poems of Edmund Spencer. The metaphysical poets did not care so much for rhyme and rhythm as they cared to display scholarship in their poems.
   
          There was a revolt against the outdated and exhausted if 17th century there was Elizabethan poetry. So is the one of important cause of being in existence of metaphysical poetry. 





Metaphysicism in poetry is  the fruit of  the Renaissance tree becoming over-ripe and approaching putrescence”
    
                                  -C.S.Lewis
   
   The leader of this revolt was Ben Johnson and John Donne. Bothe was forced personalities who attracted staunched followers and founded school. John Donne’s poetry is remarkable for his concentrated passion, intellectual agility and dramatic power. His poetry is marked with a tone of realism. Literally ‘Meta’ means “beyond” and ‘Physics’ means “ Physical nature”.



“Donne is metaphysical not only by virtue of his scholasticism, but by his deep reflective interest in the experience of which his poetry is the expression. The new psychological curiosity with which writes of love and religion”
                                   -Grierson
                       
       In Donne’s poetry there is always an “intellectual analysis of emotion”. He established lover as “saint of love” a poem of Donne is a piece of drama

Metaphysical poetry of John Donne:-
1)       Death, be not proud
2)       Sweetest love I do  not go
3)       The dream
4)       The ecstasy
5)       The Flea

“Death, be not proud”
         In this poem, poet addresses the death. Saying that is no need for death to be proud through some people calls it very powerful nor dangerous. It neither powerful nor dangerous , death believes that even throws those people die not die at all. Death has no capacity  to kill poet. This how Donne challenges the death , the picture of death is nothing but sleep and rest.
     Donne considered his sonnet saying that death need not become proud. This life is a sleep in sense that it is full if illusion but death liberate us form that illusion and we wake up forever. Donne believes that of death is accepted with this spirit there is no any death itself die.

     “The Ecstasy”
 The Ecstasy by John Donne  is a poem about divine and spiritual experience  in love. The pair of lover and his beloved which we find in a poem has reached such a height of love that both experience ecstasy of love. The poem is considered by lover who describes in detail the experience of ecstasy in love.
        Both lover and his beloved   set for the whole day on a bank of river in the same manner as bed is always company of pillow.

  

 where, like a pillow on a bad,
   A pregnant bank swelled up rest”

     Their Ecstasy makes them aware of the truth that the body is theirs but they are not body. It is here that the meeting points takes
Place between ‘The Geeta’ and spiritual love of the lovers. The considered    such divine experience as a favor of heaven to him it is this experience of ecstasy which lover accepts as bliss of God almighty. In this poem Donne show spirituality of lovers against death.


         Donne’s poems show how metaphysical elements are in present poem. Donne followed it and become the founder of metaphysical school of poets. And other pots like George Herbert, Abraham Cowley etc. are followed  him.


Opinion of critics:-
      Critics like John Duncan, Helen White, Samuel Johnson and T. S. Eliot have commented extensively on metaphysical poetry as the poetry made for a class and not for mass. Helen White’s opinion that it was the demand of time to write  poetry in a different  way . had they continue to writing poetry in same manner as the former poets, their poetry would have been rejected , the metaphysicals realized need for a change in poetry and so they wrote   in a different way. T. S. Eliot in his essay ‘The metaphysical poets’  tries to assess the school of Donne by commenting on each metaphysical poet.